|
Post by Braves GM (Nick) on Jun 2, 2011 8:57:10 GMT -5
AAS - $300 K
|
|
|
Post by Yanks GM (Justin) on Jun 2, 2011 12:36:44 GMT -5
aas: 400k
|
|
|
Post by Reds GM (Victor) on Jun 2, 2011 15:48:32 GMT -5
1M AAS
|
|
|
Post by Yanks GM (Justin) on Jun 2, 2011 18:08:10 GMT -5
4 years 1.2M
|
|
|
Post by Braves GM (Nick) on Jun 2, 2011 22:22:22 GMT -5
Yanks Bid is illegal
AAS - $1.2 Mil
|
|
|
Post by Reds GM (Victor) on Jun 2, 2011 23:42:54 GMT -5
1.4M AAS
|
|
|
Post by Yanks GM (Justin) on Jun 3, 2011 21:50:19 GMT -5
1.6 AAS
|
|
Pirates GM (Bob M)
College
Confucious say: "Baseball wrong - man with four balls cannot walk."
Posts: 104
|
Post by Pirates GM (Bob M) on Jun 4, 2011 17:23:13 GMT -5
$1.8
|
|
|
Post by Reds GM (Victor) on Jun 5, 2011 17:04:35 GMT -5
1.9M AAS
|
|
|
Post by Scott Boras (Free Agency) on Jun 9, 2011 5:11:48 GMT -5
Well the Yankees bid was illegal because they didn't raise the bid by the min. The Reds bid was illegal because their bid wasnt increased by the min.
|
|
|
Post by Reds GM (Victor) on Jun 9, 2011 15:29:15 GMT -5
so who won him and why mention it now? I look back at the last 6 FA won that had more than 1 bid and not one followed the .5M rule of bidding increments. Even one that the person that RUNS the Boras account won a FA by bidding only .1M more than last bidder. Are we gonna go back and fix all of those then? I didnt even think about looking because it was never mentioned and seemed to be what everyone was doing. Also didnt think the bidding increment didnt change till over 10M. Will know the rule now but want ALL the previous FA bids changed then.
|
|
|
Post by Reds GM (Victor) on Jun 9, 2011 15:36:15 GMT -5
so what makes my bid illegal? I thought for a second that it was .5M its only .1M..
That was quoted from the Free Agency rules, which I hoped the Boras account would know.
|
|
|
Post by Scott Boras (Free Agency) on Jun 9, 2011 19:43:27 GMT -5
My mistake.
Reds sign Charlie Furbush to a minor league contract
aas 1.9M
|
|